<\/a>Karl Friston is looking to move forward describing the ‘free energy principle’, for example using the Friston\/Ramstead\/Babcock paper describing “all life in terms of Markov Blankets.” https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/karl-friston-free-energy-principle-artificial-intelligence\/<\/a> and https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1571064517301409<\/a><\/p>\n Another term for Markov Blankets might be “Liquid Membraning”. I use Liquid Membraning in problem-solving; the cognitive process appears to be akin to stitching up data-points into Markov Blankets. “Cloud-Boxing” is my other term. The suggestion here is to shift away from the rigid\/fixed\/ossifying nature of the term “blankets” to a flow-state framework that evokes particulates and osmoticity? Could the term instead be Markov “fluidics,” “flow-states”, “nets”, “clouds”, and\/or “meshes”?<\/p>\n “Liquid Membraning”* is the deep enveloping that evanescently correlates datasets during the gloaming phase of a sort; stitching up cloud-points out of constellations of clues; out of a search to find the deep root cause of a challenge\/problem\/issue\/threat [ie. to go back to the deep root first principle]. This produces a key that when turned unlocks the entire problem. Computationally you could call it super-swarming. It has been suggested that creatives approach a task ‘more intuitively’, not analytically. I disagree; these skills could be characterized as hyperfast analytical tasking. Think of super-swarming as standing in a cloud. Where the cloud is a set of data points. Among these are the discrete clues that I notice. Among these are the patterns and there a route of questions to find, to follow, down to the root clue\/key that unlocks everything. Another way to look at this is to say I see all the trees in the forest, and then notice the clue paths and patterns that lead me back to the one different tree.<\/p>\n * definition circa 25 Nov 2018<\/p>\n
\n
\n