Technique to continuously develop and improve discovery hypotheses

One of my British technology advisors told me about Paul Whitewick’s British History travelogues after learning about my love of Time Team. From this, I’ve decided to post this method of hypotheses development for you, my readers, to employ: From the activity of developing hypotheses, I’ve developed a Landscape Economics Analysis (“LEA”) technique. It is under Peregrinations in the Cartoproblematica Navigation Menu: https://davehuer.com/cartoproblematica/hypothesis-development-techniques/Proximity of Desire (POD) is linked there also.
 
Hope this sparks new questions that lead to interesting avenues of enquiry.
 

Interplanetary Patents Enforceability

I’ve been reviewing patenting matters; and being fascinated by all things New Space, got to speculating. Does patent enforceability define the edge of the known world? Of human civilization? How will the Court enforce patent rights off-Earth? Here’s the link to the full diagram [pdf link].

I’ve named the line of enforceabilityFirenzian Enforceability Orbits” (FEO) = the halfway mark of a physical no-layover trip by counsel (or bailiff!). The FEO name is in honour of the City of Firenze, Tuscany, Italy; city descendant of the Florentine Republic: the first State to award the first recorded patent, granted to Filippo Brunelleschi, architect and engineer (1421).

Using current law, Duration will be 17years. But what about Locus of Origination (LOO)? Will LOO be 17years from an Earth court, or Launch pad, or Space Station? Will enforcement commence from the Court of the “local” planet, or will system-wide law prevail?

 

And what about Faster-than-Light (FTL) Enforceability? Imagine the legal conundrums of FTL paradoxicality

Thomas Aquinas wondered: “Can several angels be in the same place?” If angels are quantum beings, it seems that they could be. What about FTL Process Servers? (ha!).

 

 

 

 

** Some parties might call it FOMO.